The company added that EU sanctions are intended to limit consequences for “those not responsible for the actions that have triggered their imposition,” according to its understandings how sanctions would be imposed. ![]() In addition, the company attaches great importance to transparency and ethical, responsible conduct.” ![]() “Kaspersky contributes to cybersecurity and cyber resilience in Europe and globally with extensive expertise and market-leading solutions, services and products. “In Europe, Kaspersky runs legal entities in 13 countries, conducts research and development, maintains several hundred high-quality jobs, and pays wages, taxes and social security contributions,” the company said in the statement. In April, Poland sanctioned 50 countries and people, including Eugene Kaspersky.Ī Kaspersky spokesperson told CyberScoop in an email this week that the company is aware of both the discussions within the EU of a new sanctions package and the proposal from Poland, the Baltic States and Ireland to ban Kaspersky in the EU. either cut ties or warned about the supposed dangers of using Kaspersky products amid claims it could be used by the Russian government to further its wartime goals. Government agencies and private interests in Germany, Italy and the U.S. The proposal follows previous moves against the company following the Ukraine invasion. Late last week, Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania proposed that the European Union ban Kaspersky as part of a broader wave of sanctions against Russia that included cutting Russian banks Gazprombank, Alfa Bank, Rosbank and Tinkoff Bank from the international SWIFT payment system, banning cooperating with Russia on nuclear energy and stopping EU firms from performing IT work for Russian clients, EU Observer reported. And if that’s the case the good guys have every right to throw them out,” said Bossert, now president of Trinity Cyber, Inc. “To me, at this point, Kaspersky’s continued support of the Russian defense ministry has demonstrated that they’ve made a choice to help the bad guys. “The notion that all of Kaspersky’s defenses and arguments in the past must now be looked through the current unlawful military operations in Ukraine puts all of this into stark relief,” Tom Bossert, former homeland security advisor for President Trump, told CyberScoop. Now, a new wave of potential actions aimed at Kaspersky as an additional means of punishing Moscow over the war adds even more pressure on the already beleaguered company. In March, after Eugene Kaspersky tweeted that he hoped Ukrainians and Russians could “compromise,” as the Russians were bombing civilian targets, and many security researchers questioned why the company was protecting Russian military web assets from DDoS attacks, industry and government leaders worldwide again questioned whether it could be trusted. Indeed, the company founded in 1989 has hundreds of millions of users worldwide and a track record of producing some of the most important cybersecurity research over the past three decades, often exposing Russian cyber operations against American interests.īut the Ukraine war has given Kaspersky critics even more ammunition. ![]() Its founder, Eugene Kaspersky, regularly denied his antivirus company was doing the bidding of the Russian government. and Britain and mounting suspicions of links to Russian intelligence services, Moscow’s most famous cybersecurity company, Kaspersky, managed to persevere. Despite suffering years of government bans in the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |